best trust jurisdiction 2025?

Joined
Apr 15, 2025
Messages
30
Offline
trying to lock things down for the long haul. estate planning, layered structures, the usual — but 2025’s looking spicy. I need a jurisdiction that doesn’t fold under pressure, respects privacy, and hasn’t gone full snitch mode lately. any of y’all seen major changes or found new safe zones?
 
trying to lock things down for the long haul. estate planning, layered structures, the usual — but 2025’s looking spicy. I need a jurisdiction that doesn’t fold under pressure, respects privacy, and hasn’t gone full snitch mode lately. any of y’all seen major changes or found new safe zones?
Nevis still god-tier for asset protection
trusts there straight up ignore foreign judgments
you could get sued in 10 countries and still sleep fine in your hammock
only downside? if you name yourself trustee you might as well post your SSN
 
Nevis still god-tier for asset protection
trusts there straight up ignore foreign judgments
you could get sued in 10 countries and still sleep fine in your hammock
only downside? if you name yourself trustee you might as well post your SSN
Nevis cool but getting heat lately
saw a FATF side-eye memo calling them “non-cooperative” again
which honestly makes me trust them more
 
Cook Islands still flexin
strongest firewall against seizure
doesn’t care if the US screams, unless there’s local fraud (and even then you gotta really f*ck up)
wrap it in an LLC and use a domestic protector = armored privacy
 
Cook Islands still flexin
strongest firewall against seizure
doesn’t care if the US screams, unless there’s local fraud (and even then you gotta really f*ck up)
wrap it in an LLC and use a domestic protector = armored privacy
Cook’s solid but trust setup fees ain’t cute
and don’t use their banks
separate the trust from custody or enjoy your “routine compliance hold” during an audit year
 
trying to lock things down for the long haul. estate planning, layered structures, the usual — but 2025’s looking spicy. I need a jurisdiction that doesn’t fold under pressure, respects privacy, and hasn’t gone full snitch mode lately. any of y’all seen major changes or found new safe zones?
Switzerland used to be clean but 2025 hit ‘em hard
privacy erosion + weird treaty obligations
you store your wealth in a Swiss trust now, you’re just asking to be catalogued
 
Switzerland used to be clean but 2025 hit ‘em hard
privacy erosion + weird treaty obligations
you store your wealth in a Swiss trust now, you’re just asking to be catalogued
yeah and now they’re leaking names like a Reddit mod with admin logs
if you still trust Swiss banking law, I got a Bearer Share I’ll sell you
 
not enough people talk about Mauritius
low noise, stable laws, no knee-jerk FATCA reactions
and if you structure it under a GBC2, you’re basically running stealth mode under a flag of plausible regulation
 
not enough people talk about Mauritius
low noise, stable laws, no knee-jerk FATCA reactions
and if you structure it under a GBC2, you’re basically running stealth mode under a flag of plausible regulation
Mauritius stays slept on
only issue is you need a local agent who isn’t moonlighting as a yacht broker
 
one more: Palau
tiny, no treaties, almost no enforcement
only reason they aren’t popular is ’cause no one knows how to find a real provider there
I used them once. the trust name was literally “Blue Shell Holdings.” worked flawlessly.
 
one more: Palau
tiny, no treaties, almost no enforcement
only reason they aren’t popular is ’cause no one knows how to find a real provider there
I used them once. the trust name was literally “Blue Shell Holdings.” worked flawlessly.
so we’re lookin at:
Cook = fireproof but pricey
Nevis = lawsuit kryptonite
Mauritius = low radar
Palau = ghost mode
Switzerland = used to be classy, now a leaky faucet
 
so we’re lookin at:
Cook = fireproof but pricey
Nevis = lawsuit kryptonite
Mauritius = low radar
Palau = ghost mode
Switzerland = used to be classy, now a leaky faucet
yeah but real talk, the jurisdiction doesn’t matter if your name’s on sh*t
you can have a bulletproof trust in Narnia but if the IRS sees “Grantor: John T. Idiot” they’re comin
 
final word: if your trust isn’t controlled through at least one nominee director, a second protector, and a layered offshore shelf, you didn’t build it

you just bought an overpriced liability
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
[FOX] Ultimate Translator
Translate