used osome.com (https://www.osome.com) to run a nominee shell in SG — 100% friction, zero accountability, still usable

M.O.A.B

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2025
Messages
106
Offline
this ain’t one of those “smooth experience 10/10” reviews. osome.com looks polished, marketed like a fintech unicorn, all AI-powered accounting, instant LLC setups in singapore and hk, etc — but under the hood? you’re getting slapped around by glorified chatbots with zero post-sale accountability. the only reason i didn’t bin the whole thing mid-process is because their broken system let me get away with a nominee layer build that probably shouldn’t have been approved in the first place.


so here’s the setup: i needed a fast-track SG private ltd with nominee director cover + tier-2 bank onboarding + digital accounting wrapper i could use for ghost invoicing. their site said 2-3 days with full compliance assist. took 11 days, 3 broken onboarding calls, and ended with them pushing Airwallex on me like it was a legitimate bank (lol). airwallex flagged my transaction activity within 48 hours. even though i built the entity with spoofed vendor flows and offshore IP structuring, their AI-layer tried to reroute KYC requests through osome — which never replied. that saved me, ironically, because it never hit. had they followed up, the whole thing would’ve collapsed. so yeah… silence = safety, in this case.


the big issue is they act like they’re compliance-ready but can’t even maintain continuity. their nominee director doc came back missing a signature (which i edited myself in photoshop), their “real-time dashboard” glitched half the time, and when i tried to export a financial summary for a fake audit trail, the ledger spit out gibberish. but none of it got flagged. i ran an OTC desk test using an SPV routed through the entity, piped stablecoin invoices via that dashboard, and used a synthetic remittance report for proof-of-funds — it all went through. they don’t check. they just auto-approve and bounce you between reps with first names like “Dave from Osome” who never actually show up. so no, i wouldn’t recommend them to a normal client. but if you know what you’re doing, and need to burn a corp clean inside 3 months with nominee coverage + light audit falsification, they’re borderline perfect.
 
this ain’t one of those “smooth experience 10/10” reviews. osome.com looks polished, marketed like a fintech unicorn, all AI-powered accounting, instant LLC setups in singapore and hk, etc — but under the hood? you’re getting slapped around by glorified chatbots with zero post-sale accountability. the only reason i didn’t bin the whole thing mid-process is because their broken system let me get away with a nominee layer build that probably shouldn’t have been approved in the first place.


so here’s the setup: i needed a fast-track SG private ltd with nominee director cover + tier-2 bank onboarding + digital accounting wrapper i could use for ghost invoicing. their site said 2-3 days with full compliance assist. took 11 days, 3 broken onboarding calls, and ended with them pushing Airwallex on me like it was a legitimate bank (lol). airwallex flagged my transaction activity within 48 hours. even though i built the entity with spoofed vendor flows and offshore IP structuring, their AI-layer tried to reroute KYC requests through osome — which never replied. that saved me, ironically, because it never hit. had they followed up, the whole thing would’ve collapsed. so yeah… silence = safety, in this case.


the big issue is they act like they’re compliance-ready but can’t even maintain continuity. their nominee director doc came back missing a signature (which i edited myself in photoshop), their “real-time dashboard” glitched half the time, and when i tried to export a financial summary for a fake audit trail, the ledger spit out gibberish. but none of it got flagged. i ran an OTC desk test using an SPV routed through the entity, piped stablecoin invoices via that dashboard, and used a synthetic remittance report for proof-of-funds — it all went through. they don’t check. they just auto-approve and bounce you between reps with first names like “Dave from Osome” who never actually show up. so no, i wouldn’t recommend them to a normal client. but if you know what you’re doing, and need to burn a corp clean inside 3 months with nominee coverage + light audit falsification, they’re borderline perfect.
yo. that airwallex pipeline still force-routing invoice data back to SG MAS reporting? or did they patch that loophole last qtr?
 
yo. that airwallex pipeline still force-routing invoice data back to SG MAS reporting? or did they patch that loophole last qtr?
still routes unless you disable transaction categorization manually through the API. the frontend doesn’t show that toggle. they rely on the user never reading docs.
 
yo. that airwallex pipeline still force-routing invoice data back to SG MAS reporting? or did they patch that loophole last qtr?
also worth noting — airwallex only reports full transaction metadata if the corp is flagged in their AML index. the moment you route via a dormant shell or cloak through a digital nomad entity, they revert to summary data only.
 
this ain’t one of those “smooth experience 10/10” reviews. osome.com looks polished, marketed like a fintech unicorn, all AI-powered accounting, instant LLC setups in singapore and hk, etc — but under the hood? you’re getting slapped around by glorified chatbots with zero post-sale accountability. the only reason i didn’t bin the whole thing mid-process is because their broken system let me get away with a nominee layer build that probably shouldn’t have been approved in the first place.


so here’s the setup: i needed a fast-track SG private ltd with nominee director cover + tier-2 bank onboarding + digital accounting wrapper i could use for ghost invoicing. their site said 2-3 days with full compliance assist. took 11 days, 3 broken onboarding calls, and ended with them pushing Airwallex on me like it was a legitimate bank (lol). airwallex flagged my transaction activity within 48 hours. even though i built the entity with spoofed vendor flows and offshore IP structuring, their AI-layer tried to reroute KYC requests through osome — which never replied. that saved me, ironically, because it never hit. had they followed up, the whole thing would’ve collapsed. so yeah… silence = safety, in this case.


the big issue is they act like they’re compliance-ready but can’t even maintain continuity. their nominee director doc came back missing a signature (which i edited myself in photoshop), their “real-time dashboard” glitched half the time, and when i tried to export a financial summary for a fake audit trail, the ledger spit out gibberish. but none of it got flagged. i ran an OTC desk test using an SPV routed through the entity, piped stablecoin invoices via that dashboard, and used a synthetic remittance report for proof-of-funds — it all went through. they don’t check. they just auto-approve and bounce you between reps with first names like “Dave from Osome” who never actually show up. so no, i wouldn’t recommend them to a normal client. but if you know what you’re doing, and need to burn a corp clean inside 3 months with nominee coverage + light audit falsification, they’re borderline perfect.
lemme guess… you edited the director signature with PDFescape? 😭

i’ve done 3 nominee wraps with osome and every time it came back half-filled, sometimes with chinese legal names missing. their backend is just google sheets and ai genies.
 
lemme guess… you edited the director signature with PDFescape? 😭

i’ve done 3 nominee wraps with osome and every time it came back half-filled, sometimes with chinese legal names missing. their backend is just google sheets and ai genies.
wasn’t even that advanced, bro. screenshotted it, imported into gimp, cloned the strokes and faked a dry seal. took 6 minutes. they emailed it straight to the bank afterward, no questions asked.
 
also worth noting — airwallex only reports full transaction metadata if the corp is flagged in their AML index. the moment you route via a dormant shell or cloak through a digital nomad entity, they revert to summary data only.
you think there’s any risk long-term if you route trade finance docs through osome’s ledger? not for active use, just for B2B credit rigging.
 
only risk is audit trail leakage if you actually submit their exports to a legit institution. their ledger isn’t real double-booked. it’s skin-deep — doesn’t log reversals properly. i tested a fake disbursement then retracted it, ledger still showed both lines.
 
they ever hit you with invoice match verification or attempt to “re-onboard” after suspicious activity?
 
they ever hit you with invoice match verification or attempt to “re-onboard” after suspicious activity?
never. i ghosted them mid-second month and still had full dashboard access. used the nominee corp to open a stripe SG shell — patched the company profile into an aged wallet KYC, not a single bounce.
 
rented address off regus clone + fake unit number, routed all gov mail to a dropbox in clementi. nobody checked anything.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
[FOX] Ultimate Translator
Translate